Adaptation and Social Mobility Strategies in Facing Industrialization: Insights from Rural Communities
Kata Kunci:
Industrialization, Rural communities, Adaptation strategies, Social mobility, Community resilienceAbstrak
This research investigates the dynamics of adaptation and social mobility strategies employed by rural communities facing industrialization. Through a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative interviews, focus groups, participant observation, and quantitative surveys, the study examines how rural residents navigate the challenges and opportunities brought about by industrial transformation. The findings reveal a range of adaptation strategies, including economic diversification, promotion of local value chains, social capital formation, and institutional innovation. Moreover, the research highlights the role of education, spatial dynamics, social networks, and human capital in shaping social mobility patterns within rural communities. The implications of the findings for understanding rural development, shaping industrialization policies, and fostering community resilience are discussed, emphasizing the need for holistic, inclusive, and place-based approaches to rural development. Overall, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between industrialization, adaptation, and social mobility in rural communities, with implications for policy, practice, and future research endeavors.
Referensi
Akinyode, B. F., & Khan, T. H. (2018). Step by step approach for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 5(3).
Amare, D., & Endalew, W. (2016). Agricultural mechanization: Assessment of mechanization impact experiences on the rural population and the implications for Ethiopian smallholders. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(2), 39–48.
Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 21–34.
Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. Methodological Advances in Cross-National Surveys of Educational Achievement, 150, 197.
Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54.
Delgado, R., & Veltmeyer, H. (2016). Agrarian change, migration and development. in North America by Fernwood Publishing, Canada, 2016.
Ewing-Cobbs, L., Prasad, M. R., Kramer, L., Cox, C. S., Baumgartner, J., Fletcher, S., Mendez, D., Barnes, M., Zhang, X., & Swank, P. (2006). Late intellectual and academic outcomes following traumatic brain injury sustained during early childhood. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 105(4), 287–296.
Fadhil, R., Maarif, M. S., Bantacut, T., & Hermawan, A. (2017). A review on the development strategies of agro-industrial institutions in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(4).
Filippini, R., Lardon, S., & Corsi, S. (2020). An inter-and transdisciplinary, multiscale and mixed methods pathway to study Smart Agriculture in Italy. In Smart Development for Rural Areas (pp. 153–178). Routledge.
Flora, C. B. (2018). Rural communities: Legacy+ change. Routledge.
Goletti, F. (1999). Agricultural diversification and rural industrialization as a strategy for rural income growth and poverty reduction in Indochina and Myanmar.
Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. (2009). Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups.
Hwang, D., & Stewart, W. P. (2017). Social capital and collective action in rural tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 81–93.
Leavy, J., & Hossain, N. (2014). Who wants to farm? Youth aspirations, opportunities and rising food prices. IDS Working Papers, 2014(439), 1–44.
Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135–143.
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work?
Marete, E. M. (2020). Adaptation of spatial development framework methods for agricultural value chain development. University of Twente.
McDowell, C., & De Haan, A. (1997). Migration and sustainable livelihoods: A critical review of the literature.
Melnyk, L. H., Kubatko, O. V., Dehtyarova, I. B., Dehtiarova, I. B., Matsenko, O. M., & Rozhko, O. D. (2019). The effect of industrial revolutions on the transformation of social and economic systems.
Petrova, E., Dewing, J., & Camilleri, M. (2016). Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study. Nursing Ethics, 23(4), 442–454.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). sage.
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41.
Rose, D., & Harrison, E. (2010). Social class in Europe. An Introduction to the European Socio-Economic Classification.
Smit, B., & Pilifosova, O. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. Sustainable Development, 8(9), 9.
Spielman, D. J., Davis, K., Negash, M., & Ayele, G. (2011). Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 195–212.
Stearns, P. N. (2020). The industrial revolution in world history. Routledge.
Szolnoki, G., & Hoffmann, D. (2013). Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 57–66.
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection.
Vanclay, F., Baines, J. T., & Taylor, C. N. (2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(4), 243–253.
Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS. ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Maarif Syahputra, Manda Rianti
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
