The Effectiveness of Public Service Digitalization Policies in Promoting Social Inclusion

Authors

  • Hugo Abejundio Research Group on Digital Communication and Information. Department of Journalism and Communication, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  • Samantha Samantha Research Group on Digital Communication and Information. Department of Journalism and Communication, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Keywords:

Public Service Digitalization, Social Inclusion, Digital Divide, E-Government, Policy Effectiveness

Abstract

The digitalization of public services has become a central strategy for governments to enhance efficiency, transparency, and accessibility. However, the extent to which these policies promote social inclusion remains a critical concern, particularly in the context of persistent digital inequalities. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of public service digitalization policies in fostering social inclusion, with a focus on accessibility, usability, coverage, equity, and user satisfaction. A mixed-methods approach is employed, combining quantitative data collected through surveys of digital service users with qualitative insights obtained from interviews with government officials and citizens, as well as analysis of relevant policy documents. The findings indicate that while digitalization has significantly improved service efficiency and expanded access, its impact on social inclusion is uneven. Urban populations and individuals with higher levels of digital literacy benefit more from digital services, whereas rural communities, the elderly, low-income groups, and people with disabilities continue to face substantial barriers. Key challenges identified include limited internet infrastructure, low digital literacy, resistance to technology, policy implementation gaps, and budget constraints. The study concludes that the effectiveness of digitalization policies is moderate and highly dependent on supporting conditions such as infrastructure availability, user capability, and inclusive policy design. To enhance social inclusion, the study recommends strengthening digital literacy programs, expanding internet access in underserved areas, designing user-friendly and accessible systems, and maintaining offline service alternatives. Ultimately, the research emphasizes that digital transformation in public services must be accompanied by inclusive strategies to ensure that its benefits are equitably distributed across all segments of society.

 

References

Abass, O. S., Balogun, O., & Didi, P. U. (2021). A policy-research integration model for expanding broadband equity through data-governed sales outreach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(2), 524–537.

Al-Besher, A., & Kumar, K. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to enhance e-government services. Measurement: Sensors, 24, 100484.

Bach, A., Shaffer, G., & Wolfson, T. (2013). Digital human capital: Developing a framework for understanding the economic impact of digital exclusion in low-income communities. Journal of Information Policy, 3, 247–266.

Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93.

Cordier, R., Milbourn, B., Martin, R., Buchanan, A., Chung, D., & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion. PloS One, 12(6), e0179109.

Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908.

Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1–e15.

Forbes, D. P., & Kirsch, D. A. (2011). The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 589–602.

Hakim, A., & Hayat, A. (2024). Transforming public policy in developing countries: A comprehensive review of digital implementation. Journal of ICT Standardization, 12(3), 337–364.

Judijanto, L., Mohammad, W., Purnamasari, E., & Muthmainah, H. N. (2023). Analysis of reliability, transaction speed, and user experience on information system integration in e-commerce business in Indonesia. West Science Information System and Technology, 1(02), 80–89.

Kaihlanen, A.-M., Virtanen, L., Buchert, U., Safarov, N., Valkonen, P., Hietapakka, L., Hörhammer, I., Kujala, S., Kouvonen, A., & Heponiemi, T. (2022). Towards digital health equity-a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 188.

Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. Routledge.

Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 18(1), 1–24.

Ntoa, S. (2025). Usability and user experience evaluation in intelligent environments: A review and reappraisal. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 2829–2858.

Panchenko, V., & Oliinyk, K. (2025). Digitalization as a challenge to shared prosperity: in search of alternative approaches to interpreting digital inequality. ІНВЕСТИЦІЇ, 202590.

Park, S., Freeman, J., & Middleton, C. (2019). Intersections between connectivity and digital inclusion in rural communities. Communication Research and Practice, 5(2), 139–155.

Pérez-Escolar, M., & Canet, F. (2023). Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(3), 1059–1072.

Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999–1007.

Powell, A., Bryne, A., & Dailey, D. (2010). The essential Internet: Digital exclusion in low‐income American communities. Policy & Internet, 2(2), 161–192.

Siddiquee, N. A. (2016). E-government and transformation of service delivery in developing countries: The Bangladesh experience and lessons. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(3), 368–390.

Tomczyk, Ł., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnęk-Gozdek, J., & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the functionality of a new e-learning platform vs. Previous experiences in e-learning and the self-assessment of own digital literacy. Sustainability, 12(23), 10219.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.

West, D. M. (2004). E‐government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30