Integrated Group Investigation Model Impact on Students’ Writing Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/kampret.v3i1.129Keywords:
group investigation model, writing achievement, teaching modelAbstract
This research was purposed to find out if integrated group investigation model could give significance impact to the students’ writing achievement. The instruments that used in this study was tests. The tests were divided into two, there were pre-test and post test. Both test consisted of 1 item. In this study, the study applied the pre-test in both control and experiment groups. After that, the study applied the teaching process by using group investigation model in experiment class and conventional way in control class. After the teaching process finished, the study took the data of the post-test. In the pre-test, the data showed that the students’ achievement in writing was low, both in control and experiment classes. The result was the students writing achievement in control class got 54.66mean score and in experiment class the students got 60.00 mean score both in pre-tests. Then, the researcher conduct the study with the students in control class taught by using conventional way and students in experiment class taught by using group investigation model. When the post-test was given to each class, the result was the students in control class got 71.00 mean score and students in experiment class got 87.66 mean score. From the data, it could be concluded that teaching writing by using group investigation model could give significance effect to the students’ writing achievement
References
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Belmont and Sharkey. (2011). The Easy Writer: Formal Writing for Academic Purposes, 3rdEdition.
Australia.
Brown, D.H. (1980). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. United States of America.
Brucem, I. (2008). Academic Writing and Genre. New York.
Cakir, I. (2006). The Use of Video as an Audio Visual Material in Foreign Language Teaching
Classroom. The Tourkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.
Chandler, D. (2000). An Introduction to Genre Theory. Australia.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student
motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340.
Collins, J. (1997). Teaching and Learning with Multimedia. USA: Routledge.
Devitt, A. (2004). Writing Genres.Southern Illinois University.
Downes, B. (1998). Media Studies. UK: Hodder Headline.
Heaton, J.B. (1990). Classroom Action Testing. New York: Longman.
Knapp and Watkins. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar. Australia: University of New SouthWales.
Mertens, N. (2010). Writing: Processes, Tools, and Techniques. New York: Nova Science
Publisher.
Prayuda, M. S., Silalahi, T. S. M., & Almanda, F. Y. (2022). Translation of Thematic Structure of
Descriptive Text from Indonesian into English. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra (Pendistra), 148-151.
Prayuda, M. S. (2020). An Analysis of the Students’ Writing Error in Report Text. Jurnal Ilmiah
Aquinas, 3(1), 96-109.
Rizka, H and Hidayati, N.N. (2015). Mega Bank of Grammar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Sherman, Dayne, et all. (2010). The Little Brown Handbook. Southeastern Writing Centre.
Simkins, M. (2002). Increasing Student Learning through Multimedia Projects. USA: Asociation for
Supervision and Curriculum Development
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. An extended cooperative learning experience in elementary
school. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological
Association, New York, 1979.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprapto. (2013). Metodologi Pendidikan: Ilmu pendidikan dan Ilmu-IlmuPengetahuan
Sosial.Jakarta: PT. Buku Seru.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (2021). Design for change: A teacher education project for cooperative
learning and group investigation in Israel. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Pioneering Perspectives in
Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Classroom Practice for Diverse Approaches
to CL (pp. 165-182). (Routledge Research in Education).
Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106760-8
Wallace, D’Archy-Adrian.(1978). Junior Comprehension 1. England: Longman.
Zheng, Z, R. (2009). Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning. New York: IGI Global.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Meikardo Samuel Prayuda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

