Determinants of Online Petition Success in Influencing Public Policy: A Quantitative Analysis
Keywords:
Online petitions, Digital democracy, Policy change, Political participation, E-governanceAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital technologies has transformed political participation by enabling citizens to engage directly in public affairs through online petition platforms. As online petitions become increasingly popular instruments of digital activism and democratic participation, understanding their effectiveness in influencing public policy has become an important area of research. This study examines the effectiveness of online petitions in driving policy change and identifies the factors associated with successful policy outcomes. A quantitative explanatory research design with a cross-sectional approach was employed using secondary data collected from major online petition platforms, government policy databases, and international governance indicators. The study analyzed a purposive sample of 250 online petitions submitted between 2018 and 2025. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and binary logistic regression to evaluate the influence of petition characteristics on policy change while controlling for relevant political and socioeconomic factors. The findings reveal that online petitions can significantly contribute to policy change; however, their effectiveness depends on multiple interconnected factors. The number of signatures, media coverage, government responsiveness, and political openness were found to have significant positive effects on policy change, whereas petition duration and social media shares did not exhibit statistically significant direct effects. Government responsiveness emerged as the strongest predictor of successful policy outcomes, highlighting the critical role of institutional support in translating digital participation into governmental action. Overall, the study concludes that successful online petitions require not only broad public participation but also supportive political institutions and effective communication strategies.
References
Addor, N., Nearing, G., Prieto, C., Newman, A. J., Le Vine, N., & Clark, M. P. (2018). A ranking of hydrological signatures based on their predictability in space. Water Resources Research, 54(11), 8792–8812.
Aichholzer, G., & Allhutter, D. (2011). Online forms of political participation and their impact on democracy. Verlag d. Österr. Akad. d. Wiss.
Aragón, P., Sáez-Trumper, D., Redi, M., Hale, S., Gómez, V., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2018). Online petitioning through data exploration and what we found there: A dataset of petitions from avaaz. org. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12(1).
Arnold, G., & Long, L. A. N. (2019). Policy expansion in local government environmental policy making. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 465–476.
Barabas, J., & Jerit, J. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy‐specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 73–89.
Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966.
Briassoulis, H. (2010). Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research, 10(6), 715–727.
Brown, D. G., & Bostrom, J. (2016). Analysis of past and present synthetic methodologies on medicinal chemistry: where have all the new reactions gone? Miniperspective. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 59(10), 4443–4458.
Cheema, G. S. (2005). Building democratic institutions: governance reform in developing countries. Kumarian Press.
Cotton, R. D. (2011). Political participation and e-petitioning an analysis of the policy-making impact of the Scottish Parliament’s e-petition system.
de Oliveira, O. J., da Silva, F. F., Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: An essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects. In Scientometrics recent advances. IntechOpen.
Di Leo, G., & Sardanelli, F. (2020). Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach. European Radiology Experimental, 4(1), 18.
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Mit Press.
Gerber, A., Huber, G., Raso, C., & Ha, S. E. (2009). Personality and political behavior. Available at SSRN 1412829.
Gunter, B. (2013). The quantitative research process. In A handbook of media and communication research (pp. 251–278). Routledge.
Jungherr, A., & Jürgens, P. (2010). The political click: political participation through E‐Petitions in Germany. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 131–165.
Koch-Baumgarten, S., & Voltmer, K. (2010). Public policy and the mass media: The interplay of mass communication and political decision making (Vol. 66). Routledge.
Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166.
Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. “ O’Reilly Media, Inc.”
Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Bahri, S., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Social media empowerment in social movements: power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 173–204.
Leston-Bandeira, C. (2019). Parliamentary petitions and public engagement: an empirical analysis of the role of e-petitions. Policy & Politics, 47(3), 415–436.
Levi, M., & Murphy, G. H. (2006). Coalitions of contention: The case of the WTO protests in Seattle. Political Studies, 54(4), 651–670.
Lu, J., & Tsai, P.-H. (2017). Signal and political accountability: Environmental petitions in China. Economics of Governance, 18(4), 391–418.
Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. Routledge.
Stein, E. A. (2017). Are ICTs democratizing dictatorships? New media and mass mobilization. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 914–941.
Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., & Shiferaw, B. (2013). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 597–623.
Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. Routledge.
Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Cyber-protest and civil society: the Internet and action repertoires in social movements. In Handbook of Internet crime (pp. 230–254). Willan.
Vidgen, B., & Yasseri, T. (2020). What, when and where of petitions submitted to the UK government during a time of chaos. Policy Sciences, 53(3), 535–557.
Wong, S. H., & Peng, M. (2015). Petition and repression in China’s authoritarian regime: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 27–67.
Yanovitzky, I. (2002). Effects of news coverage on policy attention and actions: A closer look into the media-policy connection. Communication Research, 29(4), 422–451.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Boby Suherman, Mardian Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
