The Influence of Social Media on Global Political Stability: The Mediating Roles of Political Participation, Public Trust, Information Dissemination, and Political Polarization

Authors

  • Nikolas Ethan Department of Development Studies, Philadelphia University, Amman 19392, Jordan
  • Vincent Vincent Department of Development Studies, Philadelphia University, Amman 19392, Jordan
  • Owais Alaric Department of Development Studies, Philadelphia University, Amman 19392, Jordan

Keywords:

Social Media, Global Political Stability, Political Participation, Political Polarization, Digital Political Communication

Abstract

This study examines the influence of social media on global political stability by investigating how digital platforms shape political participation, information dissemination, public trust in political institutions, and political polarization within contemporary political systems. The rapid expansion of social media has transformed political communication by increasing citizens' access to information and facilitating civic engagement, while simultaneously creating challenges associated with misinformation, disinformation, ideological polarization, and declining institutional trust. Employing a quantitative research approach with a cross-sectional survey design and a cross-national comparative framework, data were collected from active social media users through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that social media exerts both positive and negative influences on political stability. On the positive side, social media promotes political participation, enhances governmental transparency, and strengthens democratic engagement through improved communication and information accessibility. Conversely, the widespread dissemination of misinformation, the formation of online echo chambers, and increasing political polarization weaken public trust in political institutions and contribute to political instability. These findings suggest that the overall impact of social media depends on contextual factors such as digital literacy, platform governance, regulatory effectiveness, and institutional resilience. This research contributes to the literature on digital political communication by integrating multiple theoretical perspectives into a comprehensive framework and provides practical implications for policymakers, election authorities, technology companies, and civil society organizations in developing strategies to strengthen democratic resilience and promote sustainable political stability in the digital era.

References

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91.

Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 24(4), 965–984.

Cheema, G. S. (2005). Building democratic institutions: governance reform in developing countries. Kumarian Press.

Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70.

Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved?: participation, deliberation and social movements. John Wiley & Sons.

Diamond, L., & Plattner, M. F. (2012). Liberation technology: Social media and the struggle for democracy. JHU Press.

Dutton, W. H. (2011). Freedom of connection, freedom of expression: the changing legal and regulatory ecology shaping the Internet. UNESCO.

Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699.

Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.

Howell, C. R., Su, W., Nassel, A. F., Agne, A. A., & Cherrington, A. L. (2020). Area based stratified random sampling using geospatial technology in a community-based survey. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1678.

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 493–516.

Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85–118.

Kim, Y., & Zhou, S. (2020). The effects of political conflict news frame on political polarization: A social identity approach. International Journal of Communication, 14, 22.

Lindner, R., & Aichholzer, G. (2019). E-democracy: Conceptual foundations and recent trends. In European e-democracy in practice (pp. 11–45). Springer.

McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication. Routledge.

Patrick, S. (2011). Weak links: fragile states, global threats, and international security. Oxford University Press.

Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213–231.

Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the Internet: Media, technology, and globalization. ucl Press.

Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453.

Steinberg, P. F. (2015). Can we generalize from case studies? Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), 152–175.

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291.

Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature (March 19, 2018).

Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59.

Wilson, R. A., & Land, M. (2021). Hate speech on social media: Content moderation in context.

Yusoff, A. S. M., Peng, F. S., Razak, F. Z. A., & Mustafa, W. A. (2020). Discriminant validity assessment of religious teacher acceptance: The use of HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(4), 42045.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30