The Impact of Ideological Radicalization on the Social and Psychological Well-being of Adolescents
Keywords:
Ideological Radicalization, Adolescent Well-being, Psychological Effects, Social Isolation, Preventive StrategiesAbstract
This research investigates the impact of ideological radicalization on the social and psychological well-being of adolescents. The primary objective is to understand how exposure to extremist ideologies influences adolescents' emotional health, social relationships, and identity development. The research design incorporates a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews to gather data from adolescents in various communities. The methodology involves analyzing the psychological and social effects of radicalization, identifying risk factors, and exploring the effectiveness of existing preventive and intervention strategies. The main outcomes reveal that ideological radicalization contributes significantly to emotional distress, anxiety, depression, and social isolation among adolescents. Results also highlight the importance of early detection, the role of critical thinking education, and the need for mental health support and rehabilitation programs to address radicalization. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach involving educators, mental health professionals, and policymakers to prevent radicalization and promote adolescent well-being, ensuring a healthier, more resilient generation.
References
Abrahams, J. A. (2017). Ideological radicalization: a conceptual framework for understanding why youth in major US metropolitan areas are more likely to become radicalized. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.
Alava, S., Frau-Meigs, D., & Hassan, G. (2017). Youth and violent extremism on social media: mapping the research. UNESCO publishing.
Beelmann, A. (2020). A social-developmental model of radicalization: A systematic integration of existing theories and empirical research. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–14.
Bhui, K. S., Hicks, M. H., Lashley, M., & Jones, E. (2012). A public health approach to understanding and preventing violent radicalization. BMC Medicine, 10, 1–8.
Bornstein, M. H., Jager, J., & Putnick, D. L. (2013). Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, 33(4), 357–370.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2014). Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(2), 58–72.
Campelo, N., Oppetit, A., Neau, F., Cohen, D., & Bronsard, G. (2018). Who are the European youths willing to engage in radicalisation? A multidisciplinary review of their psychological and social profiles. European Psychiatry, 52, 1–14.
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442–1452.
De Jong, M. G., Fox, J.-P., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2015). Quantifying under-and overreporting in surveys through a dual-questioning-technique design. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(6), 737–753.
Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. Jama, 292(13), 1593–1601.
Harpviken, A. N. (2020). Psychological vulnerabilities and extremism among western youth: A literature review. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 1–26.
Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic analysis. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, 209–223.
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1.
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press.
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93.
Malthaner, S. (2017). Radicalization: The evolution of an analytical paradigm. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 58(3), 369–401.
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42.
Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2019). Countering radicalization: An empirical examination from a life psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(3), 211.
Pels, T., & De Ruyter, D. J. (2012). The influence of education and socialization on radicalization: An exploration of theoretical presumptions and empirical research. Child & Youth Care Forum, 41, 311–325.
Sauver, J. L. S., Grossardt, B. R., Leibson, C. L., Yawn, B. P., Melton III, L. J., & Rocca, W. A. (2012). Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87(2), 151–160.
Schabenberger, O., & Gotway, C. A. (2017). Statistical methods for spatial data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Siegel, A., Brickman, S., Goldberg, Z., & Pat-Horenczyk, R. (2019). Preventing future terrorism: Intervening on youth radicalization. An International Perspective on Disasters and Children’s Mental Health, 391–418.
Smith, L. G. E., Blackwood, L., & Thomas, E. F. (2020). The need to refocus on the group as the site of radicalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 327–352.
Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 3(1), 377–401.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amoz Defreda Reiner

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.