The Impact of Carbon Disclosure on Company Competitiveness: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies
Keywords:
Carbon Disclosure, Company Competitiveness, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), Sustainability ReportingAbstract
Carbon disclosure has become an increasingly important aspect of corporate sustainability as companies respond to climate change, growing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) expectations, and expanding regulatory requirements for environmental transparency. Transparent carbon reporting is expected to enhance corporate competitiveness by strengthening stakeholder trust, improving corporate reputation, attracting sustainable investment, and supporting long-term strategic positioning. This study aims to examine the impact of carbon disclosure on company competitiveness. A quantitative explanatory research design was employed using a cross-sectional survey of 180 publicly listed companies that publish sustainability reports. The sample was selected through purposive sampling based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and supported by corporate sustainability reports, and subsequently analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that carbon disclosure has a positive and statistically significant effect on company competitiveness. Companies with higher levels of environmental transparency demonstrate stronger competitive performance through improved corporate reputation, greater investor confidence, enhanced stakeholder trust, and increased operational effectiveness. These findings suggest that effective carbon disclosure serves not only as a regulatory compliance mechanism but also as a strategic business tool for creating sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, companies are encouraged to integrate carbon disclosure into their broader sustainability initiatives and business strategies to achieve long-term value creation and organizational competitiveness.
References
Akter, S., D’ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models: the roles of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index.
Alsaifi, K., Elnahass, M., & Salama, A. (2020). Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 711–726.
Bayon, M., & Aguilera, P. (2021). Managerial perceptions of the strategic relevance of resources and capabilities and its configuration for firm competitiveness: an exploratory study. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(3), 462–476.
Borghei, Z. (2021). Carbon disclosure: A systematic literature review. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5255–5280.
Bradley, B. (2021). ESG investing for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230.
Coetzee, P., & Erasmus, L. J. (2017). What drives and measures public sector internal audit effectiveness? Dependent and independent variables. International Journal of Auditing, 21(3), 237–248.
Cogan, D. G. (2006). Corporate governance and climate change: Making the connection. Ceres Boston, MA.
Cordeiro, J. J., & Tewari, M. (2015). Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSR: A stakeholder theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 833–849.
Daub, C.-H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 75–85.
Doyle, E., McGovern, D., McCarthy, S., & Perez-Alaniz, M. (2019). Compliance-innovation: A quality-based route to sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 266–275.
Dragomir, V. D. (2012). The disclosure of industrial greenhouse gas emissions: a critical assessment of corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 29, 222–237.
Flammer, C., Toffel, M. W., & Viswanathan, K. (2021). Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Strategic Management Journal, 42(10), 1850–1879.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Kirana, E. K., & Wahyudi, L. (2021). Building brand loyalty through consumer engagement and brand trust on skincare product. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 4(01), 218–232.
Madsen, P. L. (2012). Firm Performance and Female Director Characteristics.
Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50–79.
Morrison, C. J. (2012). A microeconomic approach to the measurement of economic performance: Productivity growth, capacity utilization, and related performance indicators. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ong, M. H. A., & Puteh, F. (2017). Quantitative data analysis: Choosing between SPSS, PLS, and AMOS in social science research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 3(1), 14–25.
Ooi, S. K., Amran, A., Yeap, J. A. L., & Jaaffar, A. H. (2019). Governing climate change: the impact of board attributes on climate change disclosure. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 18(3), 270–288.
Ottman, J. (2017). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Routledge.
Pervan, M., & Višić, J. (2012). Influence of firm size on its business success. Croatian Operational Research Review, 3(1), 213–223.
Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. simon and schuster.
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., & Ali, F. (2018). Partial least squares-structural equation modeling in hospitality and tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(3), 238–248.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer.
Wong, K. K.-K. (2019). Mastering partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-Sem) with Smartpls in 38 Hours. IUniverse.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jun Qiaofeng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

